A Forensic Linguistic Analysis of Courtroom Language in the Case of an Australian Woman Convicted of Killing a Policeman in Bali

Abstract

This study investigates the courtroom language used during the trial of an Australian woman convicted of killing a police officer in Bali, employing a forensic linguistic approach. The research aims to analyze how language was utilized by courtroom participants judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and the defendant to construct narratives, assert authority, and influence interpretation. Data were collected from courtroom transcripts, media coverage, and legal documents, and analyzed through discourse analysis and pragmatic frameworks. The findings reveal asymmetrical power relations reflected in turn-taking, lexical choices, and questioning techniques. Additionally, the study highlights the role of cross-cultural and cross-linguistic challenges in shaping courtroom communication. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of how language impacts legal outcomes, particularly in multilingual and intercultural judicial contexts.