The Use of Coercive Language in Interrogation: A Preliminary Study in Forensic Linguistics

Abstract

This article examines the use of coercive language in interrogation practices from a forensic linguistics perspective. Language in interrogations serves not only as a means of communication but also as a tool of power that can be used to shape, influence, and even manipulate the responses of the subject being interrogated. This study employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive method, utilizing secondary data in the form of interrogation transcripts, excerpts from investigative interviews, and academic references. The analysis is based on Speech Act Theory and Critical Discourse Analysis. The findings reveal five main forms of coercive language commonly used in interrogations: veiled threats, forceful affirmations, leading questions, strategic repetition, and emotional appeals. Each form carries various pragmatic functions and has significant psychological impacts on the subject, especially in situations of power imbalance. This study highlights the importance of critical awareness regarding the role of language in legal practices and the urgency of ethical regulations in the use of language during interrogations, in order to uphold the integrity of the judicial process and protect human rights.